Long-Cheng Li *, Steven T. Okino, Hong Zhao, Deepa Pookot, Robert F. Place, Shinji Urakami, Hideki Enokida, and Rajvir Dahiya *
Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, CA 94121
*To whom correspondence may be addressed at: Urology Research Center,
Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, 4150 Clement
Street, San Francisco, CA 94121.
Long-Cheng Li, E-mail: longcheng.li@ucsf.edu
Rajvir Dahiya, E-mail: rdahiya@urology.ucsf.edu
Author contributions: L.-C.L. designed research; L.-C.L., S.T.O., H.Z., D.P., R.F.P., S.U., and H.E. performed research; L.-C.L. and R.F.P. analyzed data; and L.-C.L., R.F.P., and R.D. wrote the paper.
Recent studies have shown that small noncoding RNAs, such as microRNAs and siRNAs, regulate gene expression at multiple levels including chromatin architecture, transcription, RNA editing, RNA stability, and translation. Each form of RNA-dependent regulation has been generally found to silence homologous sequences and collectively called RNAi. To further study the regulatory role of small RNAs at the transcriptional level, we designed and synthesized 21-nt dsRNAs targeting selected promoter regions of human genes E-cadherin, p21WAF1/CIP1 (p21), and VEGF. Surprisingly, transfection of these dsRNAs into human cell lines caused long-lasting and sequence-specific induction of targeted genes. dsRNA mutation studies reveal that the 5' end of the antisense strand, or "seed" sequence, is critical for activity. Mechanistically, the dsRNA-induced gene activation requires the Argonaute 2 (Ago2) protein and is associated with a loss of lysine-9 methylation on histone 3 at dsRNA-target sites. In conclusion, we have identified several dsRNAs that activate gene expression by targeting noncoding regulatory regions in gene promoters. These findings reveal a more diverse role for small RNA molecules in the regulation of gene expression than previously recognized and identify a potential therapeutic use for dsRNA in targeted gene activation.
Small dsRNAs were initially discovered as the trigger of RNAi, a
mechanism by which homologous mRNA is degraded to result in posttranscriptional
gene silencing (1, 2). dsRNA is also involved in transcriptional
gene silencing by directing DNA methylation in plants (3,
4) and heterochromatin formation in fission yeast (5)
and Drosophila (6). Only recently has transcriptional
gene silencing been discovered to occur in mammals (7, 8).
There are, however, a few cases in which small RNAs positively regulate
cognate sequences. For example, a small RNA isolated from neural stem cells
can activate the transcription of genes containing NRSE/RE1 sequences
to stimulate neuronal differentiation in adult stem cells (9).
In addition, a liver-specific microRNA was found to enhance viral replication
by targeting the 5' noncoding region of the viral genome (10).
More than three decades ago, Britten and Davidson (11)
proposed a theory in which so-called activator RNAs, transcribed
from redundant genomic regions, activate a battery of protein coding genes.
To further study the potential role that small RNAs have in gene transcription,
we selectively targeted promoter regions with synthetic dsRNAs and identified
several dsRNAs that readily activate gene expression at a transcriptional
level.
Results
dsRNAs Targeting the Promoter of E-Cadherin Induce Gene Expression.
We first designed and synthesized two 21-nt dsRNAs targeting the
E-cadherin promoter at sequence positions -302 (dsEcad-302) and
-215 (dsEcad-215) relative to the transcription start site (Fig.
1A).
Fig. 1. dsRNAs targeting the E-cadherin gene promoter induce
E-cadherin mRNA and protein expression.
Fig. 1. dsRNAs targeting the E-cadherin gene promoter induce E-cadherin mRNA and protein expression.
(A) A schematic representation of the E-cadherin promoter with its CpG island, Alu repeat element, transcription start site, and dsRNA targets.
(B) PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM dsRNA for 72 h. mRNA expression of E-cadherin and GAPDH were analyzed by RT-PCR. Samples for each treatment are shown in duplicate.
(C) E-cadherin, b-actin, and GAPDH protein levels were detected by Western blot analysis in PC-3 cells treated as in B.
(D) PC-3 cells were treated with dsEcad-215 at the indicated concentrations for 72 h. E-cadherin and GAPDH expression was detected by Western blotting.
(E) PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM dsEcad-215 for the indicated lengths of time. E-cadherin and b-actin expression was detected by Western blotting.
(F) PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM dsCon-1 or dsEcad-215 for the indicated periods of time. Mock samples were transfected in the absence of dsRNA. Western blot analysis shows E-cadherin protein levels in PC-3 cells on days 10 or 13 after single transfections.
E-cadherin is epigenetically silenced in HeLa cells because of aberrant
methylation of the CpG island within its promoter. To determine whether
E-cadherin
dsRNAs could activate E-cadherin expression from a silenced promoter, we
transfected HeLa cells with dsEcad-302 and dsEcad-215. Initially, both
dsRNA molecules failed to induce E-cadherin expression (lanes 3
and 4 in Fig. 9, which is published as supporting information
on the PNAS web site). However, when cells were cotreated with low-doses
(110 mM) of DNA demethylating agent 5-azacytidine
(Aza-C) and dsRNA, E-cadherin expression elevated to levels much
greater than treatments of Aza-C alone (Fig. 9, lanes 810).
In fact, E-cadherin protein was detectable by Western blot analysis only
after Aza-C and dsEcad-302 cotreatments (Fig. 9, lanes
9 and 10). These results suggest that preestablished methylation of
the E-cadherin promoter inhibits gene induction by dsRNA.
A previous study by Ting et al. (8) showed that synthetic dsRNAs targeting the E-cadherin CpG island induced a silencing effect on E-cadherin expression in human cells. We subsequently decided to test three more 21-nt dsRNAs (dsEcad-185, -75, and -60) that targeted regions in the E-cadherin promoter similar to those targeted by Ting et al. (8) (Fig. 10A, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). Consistent with the previous report (8), dsEcad-185, -75, and -60 did not induce gene expression, but rather caused subtle declines in E-cadherin levels when compared with mock transfections (Fig. 10 B and C). These data suggest that dsRNA-induced gene activation (RNAa, activator RNA)) is sensitive to target location.
dsRNAs Targeting the Promoter of p21 and VEGF Induce Gene Expression.
We further examined RNAa (activator RNA) on two additional
genes, p21 WAF1/CIP1 (p21) and vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF). Two dsRNAs were designed; one (dsP21322) targeted the p21
promoter at position -322 (Fig. 2A),
Fig. 2. dsRNAs induce p21 expression in different human cell
lines.
Fig. 2. dsRNAs induce p21 expression in different human cell lines. Cells were transfected with 50 nM dsRNA for 72 h. mRNA and protein levels were analyzed by RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively.
(A) A schematic representation of the p21 promoter with its CpG island,
SP1 sites, TATA signal,
transcription start site, and the dsRNA target.
(B) p21 and GAPDH mRNA expression levels in PC-3, MCF-7, and HeLa
cells after mock, dsCon-2, or
dsP21322 transfections.
(C) p21 mRNA expression levels were normalized to GAPDH. The results are presented as the mean +/- SEM of two independent experiments (two sample repeats within each experiment).
(D) Induction of p21 protein expression was confirmed by Western
blot analysis in PC-3, MCF-7,
and HeLa cells. GAPDH levels were also detected and served as a
loading control.
(E) Western blot analysis of p21 and GAPDH after mock, dsCon-2, or dsP21322 transfections in HEK293, J82, LNCaP, and T24 cells.
Fig. 3. dsRNAs induce VEGF expression in HeLa cells. Cells were transfected with 50 nM dsRNA for 72 h. mRNA levels were analyzed by RT-PCR.
(A) A schematic representation of the VEGF promoter and the location of the dsRNA target.
(B) mRNA expression of two VEGF isoforms (VEGF-189 and -165) and GAPDH in HeLa cells after mock, dsCon-2, or dsVEGF-706 transfections.
(C) VEGF mRNA expression levels were normalized to GAPDH. The results
are presented as the mean +/- SEM of two independent experiments with each
sample repeated twice.
Transfection of dsP21322 was also performed in four additional human
cell lines, including the embryonic kidney cell line HEK293, the prostate
cancer cell line LNCaP, and two bladder cancer cell lines, J82 and T24.
As shown in Fig. 2E, dsP21322 transfection resulted in varying degrees
of p21 induction in each
cell line.
Transfection of dsVEGF-706 into HeLa cells resulted in VEGF induction (Fig. 3B). Compared with mock transfections, expression of two VEGF mRNA isoforms, VEGF-165 and -189, increased 4- and 3.7-fold in HeLa cells, respectively (Fig. 3C).
IFN Response Is Not Involved in dsRNA-Induced Transcriptional Activation.
Double-stranded RNA molecules have been shown to induce the expression
of IFN-regulated genes by initiating the production of type I IFNs (1416).
This effect is mediated in part by the phosphorylation-dependent activation
of the dsRNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. To rule out the possibility
that gene induction may have occurred by a nonspecific IFN response, we
analyzed the expression of two classic IFN-regulated genes, OAS1 and OAS3,
as well as assessed PKR activation in
cells transfected with dsRNAs. As shown in Fig. 12
AC, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site,
dsRNAs did not induce the expression of OAS1 or OAS3, nor did they promote
PKR phosphorylation. Furthermore, type I IFN-a2a
treatment had no effect on E-cadherin or p21 expression
(Fig. 12D). Taken together, these results indicate
that gene induction by dsRNA did not occur by a nonspecific IFN response.
dsRNA Sequence Requirement for RNAa (Activator RNA).
To evaluate the effect of dsRNA length on RNAa (activator RNA), we truncated 5 bp from the 3' end (relative to the antisense strand) of the dsEcad-215 duplex resulting in a 16-nt dsRNA (dsEcad-21516) (Fig. 13A, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). We also extended dsEcad-215 and -302 to 26 nt (dsEcad-21526 and dsEcad-30226) (Fig. 13A). Interestingly, both the shortened and extended dsRNAs did not induce E-cadherin transcription (Fig. 13 B and C). These results suggest that dsRNAs of ~21 nt in size are preferable for RNAa (activator RNA).
To characterize the sequence requirement and specificity for RNAa
(activator RNA), we analyzed mutant dsRNAs based on dsEcad-215 (Fig.
4A) and dsP21322 (Fig. 4D).
Fig. 4. Sequence specificity for RNAa (activator RNA).
Fig. 4. Sequence specificity for RNAa (activator RNA).
(A) Sequence for E-cadherin dsRNA dsEcad-215. The antisense (guide) strand is shown in blue. Mutation of the first and last 5 bp of the dsEcad-215 duplex resulted in dsEcad-215-G3' and dsEcad-215-G5', respectively. The mutated bases are in red.
(B) PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM of the indicated dsRNA molecules for 72 h. Expression of E-cadherin and b-actin was assessed by Western blot analysis.
(C) E-cadherin levels from corresponding Western blots were normalized to b-actin and are presented as the mean +/-SEM of two independent experiments.
(D) The sequence of dsP21322 and its corresponding mutated dsRNAs.
(E) PC-3 and HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of the indicated
dsRNA molecules for 72 h. Expression levels of p21 and GAPDH were assessed
by Western blot analysis.
RNAa (activator RNA) Requires the Argonaute (Ago) 2 Protein.
Because our findings indicate that RNAa (activator RNA) and
RNAi have similar requirements for trigger dsRNAs, such as the importance
of the seed sequence and a preferred size of 21 nt, we decided to determine
whethercomponents of the RNAi pathway are also required for RNAa (activator
RNA). We synthesized specific siRNAs that targeted Ago14 (siAgo1,
siAgo2, siAgo3, and siAgo4) (17), as well as a control
siRNA (siAgo-C). We carried out transfections in PC-3 cells using
each of the Ago siRNAs alone or in combination with the p21-specific dsRNA
dsP21322.
Fig. 5. RNAa (activator RNA) requires the Ago2 protein.
Fig. 5. RNAa (activator RNA) requires the Ago2 protein.
(A) PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nMof the indicated dsRNA molecules for 72 h. mRNAexpression of Ago14 was assessed by RT-PCR. Each Ago family member was knocked down by its corresponding Ago siRNA (siAgo1, 2, 3, or 4).
(B) RT-PCR results were normalized to GAPDH expression levels and are presented as the mean +/- SEM from two independent experiments.
(C and D) PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM of each indicated
dsRNA for 72 h. Both p21 and GAPDH mRNA (C) and protein (D) levels were
determined by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis,
respectively.
(E) p21 mRNA levels were normalized to GAPDH and are pre-sented as
the mean +/- SEM from at least two independent experiments (containing
two sample repeats per experiment).
Loss of Histone 3 Methylation at Lysine-9 Is Associated with Gene Activation.
To address how promoter-targeting dsRNA molecules can increase gene
expression, we conducted ChIP assays to determine the status of histone
methylation at the E-cadherin promoter by using antibodies specific to
dimethylated histone 3 at lysine-4 (H3m2K4) and lysine-9 (H3m2K9).
Two promoter regions were mapped corresponding to the target of dsEcad-302
(region 1) and dsEcad-215 (region 2) (Fig. 6A).
Fig. 6. dsRNA-induced transcriptional activation is associated
with loss of histone 3 methylation at lysine-9.
Fig. 6. dsRNA-induced transcriptional activation is associated with loss of histone 3 methylation at lysine-9.
PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM of the indicated dsRNA molecules
for 72 h. ChIP assays were performed by using antibodies against H3m2K9,
H3m2K4, and H3m3K9 to pull down associated
DNA. The precipitated DNA was amplified by PCR using two primer
sets specific for regions 1 and 2. Input DNA was amplified as a control.
(A) A schematic representation of the E-cadherin promoter and the location of ChIP PCR regions 1 and 2 (double-arrowed lines).
(B and C) PCR amplification of DNA precipitated with H3m2K9 and H3m2K4 antibodies.
(D and E) PCR amplification of DNA precipitated with H3m3K9 antibody.
Changes in DNA Methylation Do Not Occur at dsRNA Target Sites.
We also analyzed the state of DNA methylation on the E-cadherin promoter
using the bisulfite genomic sequencing technique. The E-cadherin CpG island
and the dsRNA target regions are only sporadically methylated in PC-3 and
DU-145 cells (Fig. 15, which is published as supporting
information on the PNAS web site). dsEcad-302 and dsEcad-215 caused a slight
increase in CpG methylation, which was confined to the dsRNA target regions
(Fig. 15). However, the increase was not statistically
significant suggesting that DNA methylation does not play a role in RNAa
(activator RNA). This result is similar to previous reports investigating
transcriptional silencing in which dsRNAs targeting promoter regions did
not induce DNA methylation in mammalian cells (8, 19,
20).
Discussion
RNAi triggered by dsRNAs, such as siRNA and microRNA, is associated with the silencing of target mRNA sequences. In similar regards, several groups have also reported that targeting promoter regions with dsRNAs induces transcriptional silencing by triggering histone modification and/or DNA methylation (7, 8, 21). In these reports dsRNAs were intentionally designed to target CpG-rich regions or CpG islands within gene promoters and thus had unusually high GC content. In the present study we took a different approach to dsRNA design by closely following rational siRNA design rules (22). We scanned 1 kb of promoter sequence from each target gene and picked those candidates that did not reside in CpG islands and best adhered to the rules of functional siRNA design (i.e., low GC content, lack of repeated or inverted sequences, bias toward low internal stability at the sense strand 3' terminus, etc.). As a result, our dsRNAs avoided CpG-rich regions. Transfection of dsRNA candidates led us to identify four dsRNAs that activated the expression of targeted genes E-cadherin, p21, or VEGF. The induction in gene expression after dsRNA treatments was generally quite robust; 2- to 10-fold increases in mRNA and protein levels were routinely detected. Transfected cells also acquired changes in phenotype associated with target gene overexpression, such as the observed growth arrest in cells transfected with dsRNAs targeting the E-cadherin and p21 promoter.
In association with these observations, several other lines of evidence
suggest that gene induction by dsRNA was sequence-specific for targeted
promoter sites. First, BLAST searches against the University of California
(Santa Cruz) genome database were performed for each activator dsRNA to
ensure it did
not share homology with any sequence in the human genome other than
its intended target site. Second, two control dsRNA molecules (dsCon-1
and dsCon-2), intentionally designed to lack significant homology to all
known human sequences, did notimpact the expression of any of the evaluated
genes. Third, dsRNA mutation experiments revealed that the 5' end of the
antisense
strand, or seed sequence, in the dsRNA duplex was critical for target
gene induction. And fourth, dsRNA treatment did not induce an IFN response
nor was E-cadherin or p21 expression susceptible to IFN exposure. Taken
together, this
evidence suggests that gene induction by promoter targeting dsRNAs
is sequence-specific.
Classic RNAi by siRNA transfection is thought to be relatively short-lived
lasting only 57 days (23). Interestingly, we observed
long-lasting gene activation after a single transfection of dsRNA; E-cadherin
induction remained detectable 13 days after dsEcad-215 transfection (Fig.
1F). ChIP analysis revealed that E-cadherin dsRNAs were able to induce
epigenetic changes associated with active genes. This may provide an explanation
for the longer lasting effects, as it is believed the epigenetic markers
are
inheritable across cell division (24).
The Ago family of proteins are key regulators of RNA silencing. Humans
have a total of four closely related Ago proteins (Ago14) that
interact with trigger dsRNA and function in target recognition; however,
Ago2 is the only family member that possesses RNA cleaving activity (17,
25).
Our dsRNA
mutation analysis revealed that mismatches between the target sequence
and dsRNA were still capable of inducing gene expression, thus suggesting
that the cleavage of target sequences does not occur for
RNAa (activator RNA). Ago2 is needed to process siRNA molecules
into active forms by cleaving and discarding the passenger strand (26,
27). Perhaps Ago2 functions to convert our dsRNAs to active forms in
a similar manner. Although we do not know whether our dsRNAs are interacting
with complementary DNA or targeting cryptic promoter transcripts, Ago2
may also participate in target recognition to form a putative effector
complex.
It is important to point out that not all of the dsRNAs complementary to promoter sequences activated gene expression. For instance, dsRNA molecules targeting p27, PTEN, and APC at locations -48, -294, and -45, respectively, failed to increase gene transcription (data not shown). In other cases, some cell lines were resistant to specific dsRNAs, while sensitive to others. Transfection of dsEcad-215 into HeLa cells initially failed to activate E-cadherin expression. Similarly, dsVEGF-706 was unable to induce VEGF expression in HEK293 cells (data not shown). Both cell lines, however, were susceptible to p21 induction by dsP21322 indicating that it was not a global resistance to RNAa (activator RNA), but rather a specific condition of the target gene promoter that rendered it unresponsive. Aberrant DNA methylation in gene promoters may be one mechanism by which some promoters are resistant to RNAa (activator RNA). In support, we show that the activation of E-cadherin in HeLa cells by dsRNA is only possible in the presence of DNA-demethylating agent Aza-C. Target location may also contribute to the functional success of RNAa. For example, dsRNAs (dsEcad-185, -75, and -60) that targeted the CpG island in the E-cadherin promoter failed to induce gene expression.
In summary, by targeting the promoter region of three genes,
we have identified several dsRNAs that induce gene transcription in
a sequence-specific manner. This RNA mediated process requires the
Ago2 protein and is associated with histone changes linked to gene activation.
Although the exact mechanism is
unknown at present, the identification of such a phenomenon may
still have significant therapeutic potential. The use of RNAi is currently
being implemented as a gene-specific approach for molecular medicine. By
the same principle, the specific activation of silenced tumor suppressor
genes (e.g., p21) or other common dysregulated genes (e.g., E-cadherin)
by RNAa may further contribute to the growing therapeutic potential dsRNA-based
drugs have in the treatment of cancer and other diseases. This information
also reveals a new complication for RNAi in which siRNAs may undesirably
induce the expression of off-target genes.
Materials and Methods
dsRNA Design and Synthesis.
For each gene, we retrieved 1 kb of promoter sequence and scanned
it for dsRNA targets based on
rational siRNA design rules (22). We picked those
candidates that were located close to transcription start sites and best
adhered to the rules of functional siRNA design. A BLAST search was performed
against the University of California at Santa Cruz genome database (http://genome.ucsc.edu)
to exclude
those targets that shared homology to nonspecific human sequences.
Two control dsRNAs (dsCon-1 and dcCon-2) were specifically designed to
lack homology to all known human sequences. dsRNAs were chemically synthesized
by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) with dTdT 3' overhangs. The Ago-specific siRNAs
were synthesized as previously described (17). A control
siRNA (siAgo-C) was also designed to lack homology to Ago genes. All dsRNA
sequences are listed in Table 1, which is published as
supporting information on the PNAS web site.
Cell Culture and Transfection.
PC-3, DU-145, and LNCaP were maintained in RPMI medium 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mML-glutamine, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 mg/ml) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 maintained at 37°C. HeLa, J82, T24, HEK293, and MCF-7 cells were maintained in Eagles minimum essential medium supplemented with2mML-glutamine, Earles balanced salt solution, penicillin, streptomycin, and 10% FBS. MCF-7 and HeLa cells were supplemented with an additional 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 0.01 mg/ml bovine insulin. The day before transfection cells were plated in growth medium without antibiotics at a density of 5060%. Transfections of dsRNA were carried out by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers protocol and lasted for 72 h (exceptions occurred during time course experiments).
Nucleic Acid Extraction.
Total cellular RNA was extracted by using TriReagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH) or the RNeasy RNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Genomic DNA was isolated by using TriReagent.
Western Blot Analysis.
Cultured cells were washed with PBS and lysed with M-PER protein
extraction buffer (Pierce, Rockford,
IL). Cell lysates were centrifuged for 10 min and supernatants were
collected. Equivalent amounts of protein were resolved on 7.515% SDS/PAGE
gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes by voltage
gradient transfer. The resulting blots were blocked overnight with 5% nonfat
dry milk. Specific proteins were detected with appropriate antibodies by
using enhance chemiluminescence detection (SuperSignal West Dura Lumino/Enhancer
Solution; Pierce). Immunoblotting antibod-Li
ies used were: anti-b-actin (Sigma, St.
Louis, MO), anti-GAPDH (Chemicon, Temecula, CA), anti-E-cadherin (Zymed,
South San Francisco, CA), anti-p21 (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid,
NY), anti-PKR and anti-phospho-PKR (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston,
MA).
Bisulfite Modification of DNA, PCR Amplification, and Cloning.
Primers for bisulfite genomic sequencing PCR (Table
1) were designed by using the online program MethPrimer developed in
our laboratory (28). Bisulfite modification of DNA (1
mg)
was performed by using the CpGenome DNA modification kit (Chemicon). The
bisulfite-modified DNA was amplified as
previously described (29). PCR products were
cloned into the pCR2.1 plasmid (Invitrogen) and transformed into TOP10
cells (Invitrogen). Ten positive clones from each reaction were picked
at random and grown overnight in 2 ml of LB medium. Plasmid DNA was then
isolated and sequenced for analysis.
ChIP Assay.
The ChIP assays were performed by using a ChIP assay kit (Upstate
Biotechnology) according to the manufacturers instructions. Antibodies
that recognized H3m2K9, H3m3K9, and H3m2K4 (Upstate Biotechnology) were
used to detect specific changes in histone methylation patterns. Immunoprecipitated
DNA was reverse cross-linked, purified, and analyzed by PCR for
2532 cycles. PCR primers used for ChIP analysis are described in Table
1.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR.
One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed by using SuperScript
reverse transcriptase
(Invitrogen) and oligo(dT) primers. The resulting cDNA samples were
amplified by PCR using primers specific for E-cadherin, p21, VEGF, Ago14,
GAPDH, OAS1, or OAS3 (Table 1). Amplification of GAPDH
served as a loading control.
We thank G. R. Deng, R. Erickson, and K. Greene for critical reading
of the manuscript and Y. Shi for helpful discussion. This work was supported
by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 AG21418 and
R01 CA1018447 and Veterans Affairs Research Enhancement Award Program
and Merit Review grants.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References:
1. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC (1998)
Nature 391:806811.
2. Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl
T (2001) Nature 411:494498.
3. Mette MF, Aufsatz W, van der Winden J, Matzke MA, Matzke AJ (2000)
EMBO J 19:51945201.
4. Sijen T, Vijn I, Rebocho A, van Blokland R, Roelofs D, Mol JN,
Kooter JM (2001) Curr Biol 11:436440.
5. Volpe TA, Kidner C, Hall IM, Teng G, Grewal SI, Martienssen RA
(2002) Science 297:18331837.
6. Pal-Bhadra M, Leibovitch BA, Gandhi SG, Rao M, Bhadra U, Birchler
JA, Elgin SC (2004) Science 303:669672.
7. Morris KV, Chan SW, Jacobsen SE, Looney DJ (2004) Science 305:12891292.
8. Ting AH, Schuebel KE, Herman JG, Baylin SB (2005) Nat Genet 37:906910.
9. Kuwabara T, Hsieh J, Nakashima K, Taira K, Gage FH, "A Small
Modulatory dsRNA Specifies the Fate of Adult Neural Stem Cells", Cell,
vol 116, no. 6, pp.779-793 (19 March 2004).
10. Jopling CL, Yi M, Lancaster AM, Lemon SM, Sarnow P (2005) Science
309:15771581.
11. Britten RJ, Davidson EH, "Gene Regulation for Higher Cells:
A Theory".
New facts regarding the organization of the genome provide clues
to the nature of gene regulation.
Science, vol. 165,
no. 3891, pp. 349-357, (July 25, 1969).
12. Hsu MY, Meier FE, Nesbit M, Hsu JY, Van Belle P, Elder DE, Herlyn
M (2000) Am J Pathol 156:15151525.
13. Stockinger A, Eger A, Wolf J, Beug H, Foisner R (2001) J Cell
Biol 154:11851196.
14. Bridge AJ, Pebernard S, Ducraux A, Nicoulaz AL, Iggo R (2003)
Nat Genet 34:263264.
15. Sledz CA, Holko M, de Veer MJ, Silverman RH, Williams BR (2003)
Nat Cell Biol 5:834839.
16. Kim DH, Longo M, Han Y, Lundberg P, Cantin E, Rossi JJ (2004)
Nat Biotechnol 22:321325.
17. Meister G, Landthaler M, Patkaniowska A, Dorsett Y, Teng G,
Tuschl T (2004) Mol Cell 15:185197.
18. Shi Y, Sawada J, Sui G, Affar el B, Whetstine JR, Lan F, Ogawa
H, Luke MP, Nakatani Y (2003) Nature 422:735738.
19. Park CW, Chen Z, Kren BT, Steer CJ (2004) Biochem Biophys Res
Commun 323:275280.
20. Svoboda P, Stein P, Filipowicz W, Schultz RM (2004) Nucleic
Acids Res 32:36013606.
21. Castanotto D, Tommasi S, Li M, Li H, Yanow S, Pfeifer GP, Rossi
JJ (2005) Mol Ther 12:179183.
22. Reynolds A, Leake D, Boese Q, Scaringe S, Marshall WS, Khvorova
A (2004) Nat Biotechnol 22:326330.
23. Dykxhoorn DM, Novina CD, Sharp PA (2003) Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
4:457467.
24. Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, Jones PA (2004) Nature 429:457463.
25. Liu J, Carmell MA, Rivas FV, Marsden CG, Thomson JM, Song JJ,
Hammond SM, Joshua-Tor L, Hannon GJ (2004) Science 305:14371441.
26. Rand TA, Petersen S, Du F, Wang X (2005) Cell 123:621629.
27. Matranga C, Tomari Y, Shin C, Bartel DP, Zamore PD (2005) Cell
123:607620.
28. Li LC, Dahiya R (2002) Bioinformatics 18:14271431.
29. Li LC, Chui R, Nakajima K, Oh BR, Au HC, Dahiya R (2000) Cancer
Res 60:702706.
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0607015103/DC1
Fig. 7. A dsRNA (dsEcad-215) targeting the E-cadherin promoter inhibits PC-3 cell growth.
PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM dsCon-1 or dsEcad-215. Cell images were taken 72 h after transfection at ´100 magnification. dsEcad-215 transfected cells are sparse and less dense than dsCon-1 control transfections.
Fig. 8. dsRNAs induce E-cadherin expression in DU145 cells.
(A) DU145 cells were transfected with 50 nM dsRNA for 72 h. mRNA and protein expression of E-cadherin and GAPDH was detected by RT-PCR and Western blotting (W.B.), respectively.
(B) E-cadherin protein expression was normalized to that of GAPDH. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments (at least two sample repeats within each experiment) except for the combinational transfection using dsEcad-302 and dsEcad-215, which was repeated twice.
Fig. 9. dsRNAs induce E-cadherin expression in the presence of Aza-C in HeLa cells.
HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM dsRNA in the absence (lane 2-4) or presence (lane 8-13) of 1-10 mM Aza-C for 72 h, or treated with 1-10 mM Aza-C alone (lane 5-7). E-cadherin mRNA and protein levels were evaluated by RT-PCR and Western blot (W.B.) analysis, respectively. GAPDH levels were also determined and served as loading controls.
Fig. 10. Target location affects gene activation by dsRNA.
(A) Schematic representation of the E-cadherin promoter including sites targeted by dsRNA molecules. Activating dsRNAs (red bar), silencing dsRNAs (green bars), and dsRNAs used by Ting et al. [Ting AH, Schuebel KE, Herman JG, Baylin SB (2005) Nat Genet 37:906-910] are indicated (T1 and T2, blackbars).
(B) PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM of the indicated dsRNAs for 72 h. Expression of E-cadherin and GAPDH was determined by Western blot analysis.
(C) E-cadherin levels were normalized to GAPDH and plotted as fold changes relative to mock transfections. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM of two independent experiments.
Fig. 11. A dsRNA targeting the p21 promoter inhibits tumor cell proliferation.
PC-3, MCF-7, and HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM dsCon-2 or dsP21-322. Cell images were taken 72 h after transfection at ´100 magnification. Note that cells transfected with dsP21-322 have acquired larger and more flattened morphologies, phenotypes associated with growth arrest.
Fig. 12. IFN response is not involved in dsRNA-induced gene activation.
(A) PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM dsRNA for 72 h as indicated (blank, medium only; mock, Lipofectamine 2000 only). OAS1 and OAS3 mRNA expression levels were analyzed by RT-PCR. b-actin was also amplified as a loading control. Results are shown in duplicate.
(B) Expression of OAS1 and OAS3 was normalized to b-actin levels. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of two independent experiments plotted as fold changes relative to mock transfections.
(C) PC-3 cells were transfected with the indicated dsRNAs (50 nM) for 72 h. As a positive control for PKR phosphorylation, cells were treated with IFN-a2a (1,000 units/ml) for 24 h and subsequently treated with or without calyculin A (CalA; 0.1 mM) for 15 min. Phosphorylated PKR (Phospho-PKR), PKR, and GAPDH were detected by Western blot analysis.
(D) PC-3 cells were treated with IFN-a2a at the specified concentrations for 24 h. Expression levels of OAS1, OAS3, p21, E-cadherin, and GAPDH were determined by RT-PCR analysis. Results are shown in duplicate.
Fig. 13. dsRNA length requirement for RNAa (activator RNA).
(A) dsRNAs of different lengths derived from dsEcad-302 and -215. Bases in green are extended bases added to the original 21-nt dsRNAs.
(B) PC-3 cells were transfected with 50 nM each dsRNA as indicated for 72 h. E-cadherin and GAPDH expression levels were determined by Western blot analysis.
(C) E-cadherin protein levels were normalized to GAPDH and plotted as fold changes relative to dsCon-1-treated cells.
Fig. 14. dsRNA-induced expression of E-cadherin requires the Ago2 protein.
(A) PC3 cells were transfected with 50 nM each dsRNA as indicated for 72 h. mRNA expression of E-cadherin, Ago2, and GAPDH was determined by RT-PCR.
(B and C) E-cadherin and Ago2 mRNA expression was normalized to that of GAPDH. The results are presented as the mean ± SEM of two independent experiments.
(D) E-cadherin protein expression in cells treated as in A was assessed by Western blot analysis.
Fig. 15. DNA methylation patterns of the E-cadherin promoter in dsRNA-transfected PC-3 and DU-145 cells.
Genomic DNA was modified with sodium bisulfite. A 405-bp region of the proximal promoter was amplified by using two pairs of primers (S1/S2 and S3/S4; primer sequences are given in Table 1) and cloned into pCR2.1 vector. Ten positive clones from each reaction were picked at random and sequenced for analysis.
(A) Schematic representation of the E-cadherin promoter with its CpG sites (vertical bars), dsRNA target regions (short horizontal lines), and bisulfite genomic sequencing PCR primers (arrows).
(B and C) Methylation profile of the E-cadherin promoter in Mock, dsEcad-302, and dsEcad-215-transfected PC-3 (B) and DU-145 (C) cells. Filled squares indicate methylated CpG sites, whereas open squares designate unmethylated CpG sites.
dsRNA name Sequence (5' - 3')
dsEcad-302 S AGA ACU CAG CCA AGU GUA A[dT][dT]
dsEcad-302 AS UUA CAC UUG GCU GAG UUC U[dT][dT]
dsEcad-215 S AAC CGU GCA GGU CCC AUA A[dT][dT]
dsEcad-215 AS UUA UGG GAC CUG CAC GGU U[dT][dT]
dsEcad-215-G3' S CGU AAU GCA GGU CCC AUA A[dT][dT]
dsEcad-215-G3' AS UUA UGG GAC CUG CAU UAC G[dT][dT]
dsEcad-215-G5' S AAC CGU GCA GGU CCU UAU C[dT][dT]
dsEcad-215-G5' AS GAU AAG GAC CUG CAC GGU U[dT][dT]
dsEcad-302-26 S AGA ACU CAG CCA AGU GUA AAA GCC[dT][dT]
dsEcad-302-26 AS GGC UUU UAC ACU UGG CUG AGU UCU[dT][dT]
dsEcad-215-26 S AAC CGU GCA GGU CCC AUA ACC CAC[dT][dT]
dsEcad-215-26 AS GUG GGU UAU GGG ACC UGC ACG GUU[dT][dT]
dsEcad-215-16 S UGC AGG UCC CAU AA[dT][dT]
dsEcad-215-16 AS UUA UGG GAC CUG CA[dT][dT]
dsEcad-185 S CUA GCA ACU CCA GGC UAG A[dT][dT]
dsEcad-185 AS UCU AGC CUG GAG UUG CUA G[dT][dT]
dsEcad-75 S UGA ACC CUC AGC CAA UCA G[dT][dT]
dsEcad-75 AS CUG AUU GGC UGA GGG UUC A[dT][dT]
dsEcad-60 S UCA GCG GUA CGG GGG GCG G[dT][dT]
dsEcad-60 AS CCG CCC CCC GUA CCG CUG A[dT][dT]
dsP21-322 S CCA ACU CAU UCU CCA AGU A[dT][dT]
dsP21-322 AS UAC UUG GAG AAU GAG UUG G[dT][dT]
dsP21-322-G5' S CCA ACU CAU UCU CCC GUU C[dT][dT]
dsP21-323-G5' AS GAA CGG GAG AAU GAG UUG G[dT][dT]
dsP21-322-G3' S UGU GGU CAU UCU CCA AGU A[dT][dT]
dsP21-322-G3' AS UAC UUG GAG AAU GAC CAC A[dT][dT]
dsP21-322-m S CCA ACU UUC CAU CCA AGU A[dT][dT]
dsP21-322-m AS UAC UUG GAU GGA AAG UUG G[dT][dT]
dsVEGF-706 S GCA ACU CCA GUC CCA AAU A [dT][dT]
dsVEGF-706 AS UAU UUG GGA CUG GAG UUG C [dT][dT]
dsCon-1 S ACU UAC GAG UGA CAG UAG A[dT][dT]
dsCon-1 AS UCU ACU GUC ACU CGU AAG U[dT][dT]
dsCon-2 S ACU ACU GAG UGA CAG UAG A[dT][dT]
dsCon-2 AS UCU ACU GUC ACU CAG UAG U[dT][dT]
siAgo2 S GCA CGG AAG UCC AUC UGA AUU
siAgo2 AS pUUC AGA UGG ACU UCC GUG CUU
siAgo1 S GAG AAG AGG UGC UCA AGA AUU
siAgo1 AS pUUC UUG AGC ACC UCU UCU CUU
siAgo3 S GAA AUU AGC AGA UUG GUA AUU
siAgo3 AS pUUA CCA AUC UGC UAA UUU CUU
siAgo4 S GGC CAG AAC UAA UAG CAA UUU
siAgo4 AS pAUU GCU AUU AGU UCU GGC CUU
siAgo-C S UUC UCC GAA CGU GUC ACG UUU
siAgo-C As pACG UGA CAC GUU CGG AGA AUU
Primer name Sequence (5' - 3')
Bisulfite sequencing PCR
E-cadherin-S1 ATTTTAGTTTGGGTGAAAGAGTGAG
E-cadherin-S2 AACCCTCTAACCTAAAATTACTAAAATCTA
E-cadherin-S3 TTTAGTAATTTTAGGTTAGAGGGTTAT
E-cadherin-S4 AAACTCACAAATACTTTACAATTCC
RT-PCR
E-cadherin S CCTGGGACTCCACCTACAGA
E-cadherin AS GGATGACACAGCGTGAGAGA
P21 S GCCCAGTGGACAGCGAGCAG
P21 AS GCCGGCGTTTGGAGTGGTAGA
Ago1 S GCGAATTGGGAAGAGTGGTA
Ago1 AS GCAGGTGCTGGGATAGAGAC
Ago2 S CGCGTCCGAAGGCTGCTCTA
Ago2 AS TGGCTGTGCCTTGTAAAACGCT
Ago3 S ATCCCAGCTGGAACAACAGT
Ago3 AS GCGTACGTAAGTGTGGCAGA
Ago4 S GGGTAGGGAAAAGTGGCAAT
Ago4 AS GAGCGAGTGCACCTCACATA
GAPDH S TCCCATCACCATCTTCCA
GAPDH AS CATCACGCCACAGTTTCC
b-actin S TCTACAATGAGCTGCGTGTG
b-actin AS ATCTCCTTCTGCATCCTGTC
OAS1 S GCTGGAAGCCTGTCAAAGAG
OAS1 AS GAGCTCCAGGGCATACTGAG
OAS3 S TACCACCAGGTGTGCCTACA
OAS3 AS AAAGCATGGGTGGTCATAGC
VEGF S CCCACTGAGGAGTCCAACAT
VEGF AS AAATGCTTTCTCCGCTCTGA
ChIP PCR primers
E-cadherin region 1
(-568/-277)
Sense GGGCAATACAGGGAGACACA
Antisense GGGCTTTTACACTTGGCTGA
E-cadherin region 2
(-359/-71)
Sense GGTGAAAGAGTGAGCCCCATCTC
Antisense
TTCACCTGCCGGCCACAGCCAATCA
NetworkEditor's Perspective: "The antisense strand of dsRNA functions
as an activator of transcription".
In this interesting new analysis by Long-Cheng Li, Steven T. Okino, Hong Zhao, Deepa Pookot, Robert F. Place, Shinji Urakami, Hideki Enokida, and Rajvir Dahiya, it is shown that the antisense strand of dsRNA species activates specific gene transcription within certain human cell lines. This induction of gene transcription appears to require the prior removal of methyl groups from DNA within the affected gene promoters.
A Brief History of Activator RNA:
1. Kuwabara T, Hsieh J, Nakashima K, Taira K, Gage FH, "A Small Modulatory dsRNA Specifies the Fate of Adult Neural Stem Cells", Cell, vol 116, no. 6, pp.779-793 (19 March 2004).
2. Frenster JH, and Hovsepian JA, "Activator RNA Exchange during Interphase Chromatin Reprogramming".
3. Czihak G, "Evidence for inductive properties of the micromere RNA in sea urchin embryos".
4. Kronenberg LH, and Humphreys T, "Double-Stranded Ribonucleic Acid in Sea Urchin Embryos".
5. Ling J, Pi W, Yu X, Bengra C, Long Q, Jin H, Seyfang A, and Tuan D, "The ERV-9 LTR Enhancer is Not Blocked by the HS5 Insulator and Synthesizes Through the HS5 Site Non-Coding, Long RNAs that Regulate LTR Enhancer Function", Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, no. 15, pp. 4582-4596 (August 1, 2003).
6a. Takamizawa J, Konishi H, Yanagisawa K, Tomida S, Osada H, Endoh H, Harano T, Yatabe Y, Nagino M, Nimura Y, Mitsudomi T, and Takahashi T, "Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival". Cancer Res 2004;64:3753-3756.
6b. Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, Byrom M, Jarvis R, Cheng A, Labourier E, Reinert KL, Brown D, and Slack FJ, "RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family". Cell 2005;120:635-647.
6c. Eder M, and Scherr M, "MicroRNA and Lung Cancer", New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 23, pp. 2446-2448 (June 9, 2005).
7. Coughlin CM, Vance BA, Grupp SA, and Vonderheide RH, "RNA-transfected CD40-activated B cells induce functional T cell responses against viral and tumor antigen targets: implications for pediatric immunotherapy".
8. Buskirk AR, Kehayova PD, Landrigan A, and Liu DR, "In Vivo Evolution of an RNA-Based Transcriptional Activator".
9. Song X, Sun Y, and Garen A, "Roles of PSF protein and VL30 RNA in reversible gene regulation".
10. Shin JT, Priest JR, Ovcharenko I, Ronco A, Moore RK, C. Burns
CG, and MacRae CA,
"Human-zebrafish
non-coding conserved elements act in vivo to regulate transcription".
11. O'Gorman W, Kwek KY, Thomas B, and Akoulitchev A, "Non-coding RNA in transcription initiation", Biochem. Soc. Symp. vol. 73, 131-140 (2006).
12. Goodrich JA, and Kugel JF, "Non-coding-RNA regulators of RNA polymerase II transcription".
13. Frenster JH, "Selective Control of DNA Helix Openings during Gene Regulation", Cancer Research, vol. 36, pp. 3394-3398 (September, 1976).
14. Hovsepian JA, and Frenster JH, "Sense and Antisense during RNA Initiation of the DNA Transcription Bubble", "RNA2005", p. 279, The RNA Society, Bethesda, MD 20814-3998, (May, 2005).
15. Frenster JH, and Hovsepian JA, "Kissing Chromosomes and Paired
Sense-Antisense RNA Synthesis", Cold
Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biology 71, 62 (May, 2006).
A Brief History of Activator RNA:
Links to
Euchromatin Activator RNA Reviews:
Links to
Euchromatin Activator RNA Research:
Links to Ultrastructural
Probes of DNase I-Sensitive Sites:
Links to
RNA as a Therapeutic Agent:
Links to Hodgkin Lymphoma
Immuno-Pathology:
Links to Activated
T-Lymphocyte Immunotherapy:
Links to Medical
Systems Biology:
Links to Selective
Gene Transcription:
Links to RNA-Induced
Epigenetics:
Links to RNA-Induced
Embryogenesis:
Links to RNA and
Biological Causality:
Links to Reprogramming
and Neoplasia:
"Ultrastructural Probes of Active DNA Sites, and the RNA Activators of DNA".