Published in: J Mol Biol. vol. 350, no. 5, pp. 883-896 (July 29, 2005).
doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.05.039
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WK7-4GBD5D9-C&_coverDate=07%2F29%2F2005&_alid=295298007&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_qd=1&_cdi=6899&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=593e2452c7f7732f5dfac96c68d717ff



"The HS2 Enhancer of the b-globin Locus Control Region Initiates Synthesis of Non-coding, Polyadenylated RNAs Independent of a cis-linked Globin Promoter".

Jianhua Ling a, Boris Baibakov, Wenhu Pi a, Beverly M. Emerson c, and Dorothy Tuan a, @,

a Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
b Imaging Core Laboratory, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
c Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92138, USA

@ dtuanlo@mail.mcg.edu



Abstract:

The HS2 enhancer in the b-globin locus control region (LCR) regulates transcription of the globin genes 10-50kb away. Earlier studies show that a transcription mechanism initiated by the HS2 enhancer through the intervening DNA in the direction of the cis-linked promoter and gene mediates long-range enhancer function. Here, we further analyzed the enhancer-initiated RNAs and their mode of transcription from the HS2 enhancer in the endogenous genome of erythroid K562 cells, in plasmids integrated into K562 cells and in purified DNA used as template in in vitro transcription reactions. We found that the HS2 enhancer was able to initiate transcription autonomously in the absence of a cis-linked globin promoter. The enhancer-initiated, intergenic RNAs were different from the mRNA synthesized at the promoter in several aspects. The enhancer RNAs were synthesized not from a defined site but from multiple sites both within and as far as 1kb downstream of the enhancer. The enhancer RNAs did not appear to contain a normal cap structure at the 5' ends. They were polyadenylated at multiple sites within 3kb downstream of their initiation sites and were therefore shorter than 3kb in lengths. The enhancer RNAs remained in discrete spots within the nucleus and were not processed into mRNA or translated into proteins. These particular features of enhancer-initiated transcription indicate that the transcriptional complex assembled by the enhancer was different from the basal transcription complex assembled at the promoter. The results suggest that in synthesizing non-coding, intergenic RNAs, the enhancer-assembled transcription complex could track through the intervening DNA to reach the basal promoter complex and activate efficient mRNA synthesis from the promoter.


Introduction:

The locus control region (LCR) of the human b-globin gene domain, defined by four erythroid specific DNase I hypersensitive sites HS1, HS2, HS3 and HS4, and a ubiquitous HS5 site [1-3], regulates transcription of the far downstream embryonic e, fetal Gg and Ag, and the adult d and b-globin genes during erythroid cell differentiation and development. Among the LCR HS sites, the HS2 site located 11 kb and 55 kb 5' of the e and b-globin genes, respectively (see Figure 1(a)) possesses strong enhancer activity [4], and can regulate transcription of the globin genes over a long distance [5, 6]. Whether the HS2 enhancer and the LCR act over the long distance by a looping or a tracking mechanism is not fully understood [7-11].

Figure 1. Promoter-independent transcription of the HS2 enhancer detected by RT-PCR.

Figure 1. Promoter-independent transcription of the HS2 enhancer detected by RT-PCR.

(a) Map of the human globin gene locus. Vertical arrows: the DNase I hypersensitive sites HS1-5 defining the b-globin LCR: filled boxes, the five b-like globin genes. Angled arrow, direction of globin mRNA synthesis. In the enlarged HS2 site, H, S and Bg: HindIII, StuI and BglII sites. Numbers, sizes (in bases) of the HS2 enhancers and of the downstream DNA present in the CAT plasmids (see (b)).

(b) CAT plasmid maps. ep, the 200 bp e-globin promoter; Bg/B and S/S, BglII/BamHI and StuI/StuI junction sites between HS2 and downstream DNAs. Sense and anti-sense arrows: the HS2 RNAs and cDNAs synthesized from the HS2 RNAs by random hexamer primers, (N)6, in reverse transcription (RT). Horizontal lines 1 and 2, PCR products generated by primer pairs 1 and 2, represented by the filled triangles. Numbers below the lines, sizes (in bp) of the PCR products.

(c) HS2 enhancer transcripts analyzed by semi-quantatitive RT-PCRs. In vivo and in vitro: RT-PCR bands generated by RNAs transcribed respectively from integrated plasmids and RNAs transcribed from plasmid DNA in in vitro transcription reactions. Lanes 1 and 2, RT-PCR bands generated by primer pairs 1 and 2. Lane 0, control RT-PCR of in vitro transcribed RNA sample amplified with primer pair 2 with no reverse transcriptase in the RT step. M, 100 bp ladder of size markers. Numbers in the margins, sizes (in bp) of the size marker and the RT-PCR bands.


In attempts to define the functional mechanism of the HS2 enhancer and ultimately of the LCR, we, as well as others, have analyzed the transcriptional status of the HS2 enhancer [12-14]. The HS2 enhancer is transcribed in erythroid cells but not in non-erythroid cells. In the endogenous genome of erythroid cells and in integrated plasmids, the HS2 enhancer initiates transcription predominantly in the direction toward the downstream globin or reporter gene. Furthermore, a transcriptional terminator inserted in the intervening DNA between the HS2 enhancer and a distant, cis-linked promoter reduced HS2 enhancer activity drastically [15]. These findings provide strong support for the pivotal importance of the enhancer-initiated transcription in mediating HS2 enhancer function over a long distance. Consistent with the involvement of a transcription mechanism in long-range HS2 enhancer function, replacement of the HS2 enhancer in the genome of mice with an independent transcription unit, a neomycin-resistant gene driven by a strong promoter, to disrupt the transcription traffic at the HS2 enhancer, suppresses globin gene transcription and causes severe anemia and death of the homozygous transgenic mice [16].

However, in these transgenic mice, transcriptional suppression of the globin genes may be due to competition between the inserted foreign promoter and the further downstream globin promoters for interaction with the LCR enhancers through a looping mechanism. Similarly, HS2 transcription in the integrated plasmids and the endogenous genome may result from direct loop formation between the HS2 enhancer and the cis-linked globin promoter, which then initiates transcription in the HS2 enhancer. Hence, HS2 enhancer transcription could be initiated not by the enhancer but by the cis-linked promoter.

In this study, we used reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, RNase protection assay (RPA), 5' and 3' rapid amplification of cDNA end (RACE) and RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) visualized with two-photon laser scanning microscopy to analyze the RNAs transcribed from the HS2 enhancer in the endogenous genome of K562 cells and in plasmids integrated into K562 cells and in purified plasmid DNA used as template for in vitro transcription reactions either in the presence or in the absence of a cis-linked globin promoter. The results indicate that the HS2 enhancer was able to initiate transcription autonomously in the absence of a cis-linked promoter. Furthermore, the enhancer/LCR-initiated, intergenic RNAs were polyadenylated and relatively short (< 3 kb); they could be spliced and appeared to be synthesized by RNA polymerase II (pol II). However, the enhancer RNAs remained in discrete foci in the nucleus and were not translated into protein products. The results suggest that the HS2 enhancer assembled a pol II transcription complex, which could mediate long-range enhancer function by synthesizing non-coding, intergenic RNAs through the intervening DNA to reach the distant promoter and activate efficient mRNA synthesis of the cis-linked gene.

...

Discussion:

In this study, we characterized the HS2 enhancer RNAs and their mode of transcription by RT-PCR, RPA, 5' and 3' RACE and RNA FISH. The results indicate that the HS2 enhancer, in the endogenous genome of erythroid K562 cells, in CAT plasmids integrated into K562 cells, and in purified DNA used as templates for in vitro transcription reactions, was able to initiate RNA synthesis from multiple sites within HS2. In the integrated plasmids and in in vitro transcription reactions, the HS2 enhancer was able to initiate RNA synthesis in the absence of a cis-linked globin promoter. This result indicates that the enhancer-initiated transcription was an autonomous process and did not require the enhancer to loop and interact with the promoter in order for the promoter to initiate RNA synthesis from within the enhancer. Our finding is consistent with the results of an earlier study, which showed that the human HS2 enhancer integrated into the genome of transgenic mice in the absence of a cis-linked promoter and gene could form an erythroid-specific DNase I hypersensitive site autonomously, and was thus able to organize an open chromatin domain in erythroid cells autonomously [21]. In addition, the HS2 enhancer activated RNA synthesis from distant sites in the downstream DNA, which in the absence of the HS2 enhancer was unable to initiate transcription. These results indicate that the HS2 enhancer-assembled transcription complex was able to track and transcribe RNAs from the enhancer through the intervening DNA to reach the distant promoter and activate efficient mRNA synthesis from the cis-linked gene.

Further analyses of the enhancer-initiated RNAs showed that they were polyadenylated and many of the polyadenylated RNAs were transcribed through internal poly(A) signals. In particular, a strong polyadenylation signal was located in the middle of the 1.2 kb genomic DNA immediately downstream of the HS2 enhancer. The presence of poly(A) signals in the 1.2 kb DNA and in the DNA further downstream of HS2 raised the question of whether termination of enhancer-initiated RNAs at downstream poly(A) sites diminished HS2 enhancer activity. Earlier enhancer assays, however, showed that the HS2-1.2-ep-CAT plasmid containing the 1.2 kb DNA and thus the poly(A) signal interposed between HS2 enhancer and the e-globin promoter exhibited strong enhancer activity at a level similar to that of the HS2-ep-CAT plasmid containing the enhancer linked directly to the promoter [13, 15]. This finding was not surprising, since the HS2 enhancer was able to initiate transcription from multiple sites further downstream of the poly(A) signal in the 1.2 kb DNA. In addition, precursors for polyadenylated RNAs are known to be transcribed past the poly(A) signals for up to thousands of bases before they are truncated by nucleases and polyadenylated [22]. Hence, the enhancer transcription machinery could have proceeded by thousands of bases and reached its target before the polyadenylation was initiated.

In the integrated plasmids containing inserted splice signals, the enhancer RNAs were spliced correctly. However, the enhancer RNAs transcribed from the endogenous K562 genome were not spliced due, apparently, to the absence of appropriate splice signals in this region of the b-LCR.

The detection of enhancer RNAs that could be polyadenylated and spliced indicates that pol II is involved in HS2 enhancer-initiated transcription, since pol II through its unique C-terminal domain (CTD) has been reported to participate in both polyadenylation and splicing of the RNAs it transcribes [18[. Indeed, a-amanitin at a low concentration that specifically inhibited pol II inhibited HS2 enhancer transcription from a number of initiation sites in HS2 in in vitro transcription reactions. These results are in agreement with earlier reports that the HS2 enhancer, in the endogenous genome of K562 cells and in a 140 kb YAC DNA spanning the entire b-globin gene locus, is transcribed by pol II [14, 23]. Moreover, recent chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies show that the HS2 enhancer in both human and murine erythroid cells is associated in vivo with pol II [24 -26]. Our results cannot exclude the possibility that pol I and pol III may be involved in HS2 transcription. However, the HS2 enhancer RNAs are preferentially transcribed in erythroid cells (Figure 7(a)) [12-14], whereas pol I and pol III transcripts are ubiquitous in tissue distribution. These observations suggest that pol II is the primary polymerase involved in transcribing the HS2 enhancer in erythroid cells.

The enhancer-assembled pol II transcription complex appeared to be different in several aspects from the pol II complex assembled at the promoter. First, as opposed to pol II transcription at the e-globin promoter, which initiates mRNA synthesis at the cap site in the promoter [17, 27], the pol II enhancer complex initiated transcription from multiple sites both within the enhancer and in downstream DNA as far as 1 kb away. Second, unlike the capped 5' end of globin mRNA, the 5' ends of the HS2 enhancer RNAs frequently contained from one to five extra, non-cap bases not present in the HS2 DNA template, suggesting a different mechanism of 5' end processing by the pol II enhancer complex. Third, the enhancer RNAs were relatively short, as they were polyadenylated within 3 kb downstream of their initiation sites. Indeed, HS2 and LCR transcripts of longer than 3 kb were not detected by further analyses with Northern blots and long-range RT-PCR (J.L.D.T., unpublished results). In contrast, the chicken a-globin gene locus has been observed to be transcribed from the putative LCR through the intergenic DNA and the globin genes to produce giant, nuclear RNAs of longer than 20 kb [28-29]. Fourth, the polyadenylated enhancer RNAs were not processed into mRNA or translated into protein products. Fifth, similar to the HS3 and LCR transcripts visualized in RNA FISH in murine erythroid cells[14, 30], the HS2 enhancer RNAs in human erythroid K562 cells were confined within two or three discrete nuclear foci corresponding probably to the location of the transcription factories of the globin gene locus [19]. These findings suggest that the non-coding, intergenic RNAs were transcribed by a pol II transcription complex that is different from the basal transcription machinery assembled at the promoter.

Our findings are consistent with transcriptional studies in yeast, which show that the predominant function of enhancers is to recruit and deliver the pol II machinery to the cis-linked promoters [31-32], since the promoters, packaged in nucleosomes, are unable to bind TBP stably and recruit the pol II transcription machinery [33]. In erythroid K562 cells expressing the embryonic globin gene program, the entire 10 kb of the intergenic DNA between the HS2 enhancer and the embryonic e-globin promoter is transcribed by pol II in a relay fashion to produce not one long contiguous RNA of 10 kb but many shorter, overlapping, polyadenylated, non-coding RNAs in the sense direction co-linear with globin mRNA synthesis (this study; and D.T. et al., unpublished results) [14, 17, and 25]. In support of the functional significance of the transcription mechanism of this HS2-assembled pol II machinery in mediating long-range enhancer function between the HS2 enhancer and the e-globin gene, inserting a transcriptional terminator or an insulator [34] between HS2 and the e-globin promoter to block the enhancer-assembled pol II machinery from tracking to the promoter also blocked HS2 enhancer function [15, 26]. In the endogenous genome of human erythroid cells expressing the fetal or adult globin gene program, the functional significance of the tracking and transcription mechanism of the HS2/LCR-assembled transcription machinery in transmitting long-range enhancer/LCR function through the embryonic e-globin gene to the further downstream fetal g-globin or adult b-globin gene remains to be investigated.
...

References:

1. D. Tuan, W. Solomon, Q. Li and L.M. London, The “b-like-globin” gene domain in human erythroid cells, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82 (1985), pp. 6384–6388.

2. W. Forrester, S. Takegawa, T. Papayannopoulou, G. Stamatoyannopoulos and M. Groudine, Evidence for a locus activation region: the formation of developmentally stable hypersensitive sites in globin-expressing hybrids, Nucl. Acids Res. 15 (1987), pp. 10159–10177.

3. F. Grosveld, G.B. Van Assendelft and G. Kollias, Position-independent, high-level expression of the human beta-globin gene in transgenic mice, Cell 51 (1987), pp. 975–985.

4. D.Y.H. Tuan, W.B. Solomon, I.M. London and D.P. Lee, An erythroid-specific, developmental-stage-independent enhancer far upstream of the human “beta-like globin” genes, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989), pp. 2554–2558.

5. B.J. Morley, C.A. Abbott, J.A. Sharpe, J. Lida, P.S. Chan-Thomas and W.G. Wood, A single beta-globin locus control region element (5' hypersensitive site 2) is sufficient for developmental regulation of human globin genes in transgenic mice, Mol. Cell. Biol. 12 (1992), pp. 2057–2066.

6. J. Bungert, K. Tanimoto, S. Patel, Q. Liu, M. Fear and J.D. Engel, Hypersensitive site 2 specifies a unique function within the human beta-globin locus control region to stimulate globin gene transcription, Mol. Cell. Biol. 19 (1999), pp. 3062–3072.

7. M. Wijgerde, F. Grosveld and P. Fraser, Transcription complex stability and chromatin dynamics in vivo, Nature 377 (1995), pp. 209–213.

8. M. Bulger and M. Groudine, Looping versus linking: toward a model for long-distance gene activation, Genes Dev. 13 (1999), pp. 2465–2477.

9. J.D. Engel and K. Tanimoto, Looping, linking, and chromatin activity: new insights into beta-globin locus regulation, Cell 100 (2000), pp. 499–502.

10. D.R. Higgs, Do LCRs open chromatin domains?, Cell 95 (1998), pp. 299–302.

11. Q. Li and K. Peterson, Locus control regions: coming of age at a decade plus, Trends Genet. 10 (1999), pp. 403–408.

12. D. Tuan, S. Kong and K. Hu, Transcription of the hypersensitive site HS2 enhancer in erythroid cells, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89 (1992), pp. 11219–11223.

13. S. Kong, D. Bohl, C. Li and D. Tuan, Transcription of the HS2 enhancer toward a cis-linked gene is independent of the orientation, position, and distance of the enhancer relative to the gene, Mol. Cell. Biol. 17 (1997), pp. 3955–3965.

14. H. Ashe, M. Wijgerde, P. Fraser and N. Proudfoot, Intergenic transcription and transinduction of the human beta-globin locus, Genes Dev. 11 (1997), pp. 2494–2509.

15. J. Ling, L. Ainol, L. Zhang, X. Yu, W. Pi and D. Tuan, HS2 enhancer function is blocked by a transcriptional terminator inserted between the enhancer and the promoter, J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004), pp. 51704–51713.

16. S. Fiering, E. Epner, K. Robinson, Y. Zhuang, A. Telling and M. Hu et al., Targeted deletion of 5'HS2 of the murine beta-globin LCR reveals that it is not essential for proper regulation of the beta-globin locus, Genes Dev. 9 (1995), pp. 2203–2213.

17. M. Allan, W.G. Lanyon and J. Paul, Multiple origins of transcription in the 4.5 kb upstream of the epsilon-globin gene, Cell 35 (1983), pp. 187–197.

18. S. McCracken, N. Fong, K. Yankulov, S. Ballantyne, G. Pan and J. Greenblatt et al., The C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II couples mRNA processing to transcription, Nature 385 (1997), pp. 357–361.

19. P. Cook, Nongenic transcription, gene regulation and action at a distance, J. Cell Sci. 116 (2003), pp. 4483–4491.

20. F. Iborra, D. Jackson and P. Cook, Coupled transcription and translation within nuclei of mammalian cells, Science 293 (2001), pp. 1139–1142.

21. K. Pawlik and T. Townes, Autonomous, erythroid-specific DNase I hypersensitive site formed by human beta-globin locus control region (LCR) 5' HS2 in transgenic mice, Dev. Biol. 169 (1995), pp. 728–732.

22. N.J. Proudfoot and E. Whitelaw, Termination and 3' end processing of eukaryotic RNA transcription and splicing. In: B.D. Hames and D.M. Glover, Editors, Frontiers in Molecular Biology, IRL Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, Tokyo (1988), pp. 96–129.

23. K. Leach, K. Nightingale, K. Igarashi, P. Levings, D. Engel, P. Becker and J. Bungert, Reconstitution of human b-globin locus control region hypersensitive sites in the absence of chromatin assembly, Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (2001), pp. 2629–2640.

24. K. Johnson, H. Christensen, B. Zhao and E. Bresnick, Distinct mechanisms control RNA polymerase II recruitment to a tissue-specific locus control region and a downstream promoter, Mol. Cell 8 (2001), pp. 465–471.

25. A. Kim and A. Dean, Developmental stage differences in chromatin subdomains of the beta-globin locus, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004), pp. 7028–7033.

26. H. Zhao and A. Dean, An insulator blocks spreading of histone acetylation and interferes with RNA polymerase II transfer between an enhancer and gene, Nucl. Acids Res. 32 (2004), pp. 4903–4914.

27. J. Ling, W. Pi, X. Yu, C. Bengra, Q. Long and H. Jin et al., The ERV-9 LTR enhancer is not blocked by the HS5 insulator and synthesizes through the HS5 site non-coding, long RNAs that regulate LTR enhancer function, Nucl. Acids Res. 31 (2003), pp. 4582–4596.

28. F. Broders and K. Scherrer, Transcription of the alpha globin gene domain in normal and AEV-transformed chicken erythroblasts: mapping of giant globin-specific RNA including embryonic and adult genes, Mol. Gen. Genet. 209 (1987), pp. 210–220.

29. S. Razin, A. Rynditch, V. Borunova, E. Ioudinkova, V. Smalko and K. Scherrer, The 33 kb transcript of the chicken a-globin gene domain is part of the nuclear matrix, J. Cell. Biochem. 92 (2004), pp. 445–457.

30. J. Gribnau, K. Diderich, S. Pruzina, R. Calzolari and P. Fraser, Intergenic transcription and developmental remodeling of chromatin subdomains in the human b-globin locus, Mol. Cell 5 (2000), pp. 377–386.

31. M. Keaveney and K. Struhl, Activator-mediated recruitment of the RNA polymerase II machinery is the predominant mechanism for transcriptional activation in yeast, Mol. Cell 1 (1998), pp. 917–924.

32. M. Ptashne and A. Gann, Transcriptional activation by recruitment, Nature 386 (1997), pp. 569–576.

33. A. Imbalzano, H. Kwon, M. Green and R. Kingston, Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SW1/SNF complex, Nature 370 (1994), pp. 481–485.

34. A. Bell, A. West and G. Felsenfeld, Insulators and boundaries: versatile regulatory elements in the eukaryotic genome, Science 291 (2001), pp. 447–450.

35. J. Armstrong and B. Emerson, NF-E2 disrupts chromatin structure at human beta-globin locus control region hypersensitive site 2 in vitro, Mol. Cell. Biol. 16 (1996), pp. 5634–5644.

36. B. Emerson, J. Nichols and T. Fong, Erythroid-specific activation and derepression of the chick beta-globin promoter in vitro, Cell 57 (1989), pp. 1189–1200.

37. J. Ling, W. Pi, R. Bollag, S. Zeng, M. Keskintepe and H. Saliman et al., The solitary long terminal repeats of ERV-9 endogenous retrovirus are conserved during primate evolution and possess enhancer activities in embryonic and hematopoietic cells, J. Virol. 76 (2002), pp. 2410–2423.

38. J. Yoo, L. Herman, C. Li, S. Krantz and D. Tuan, Dynamic changes in the locus control region of erythroid progenitor cells demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction, Blood 87 (1996), pp. 2558–2567.

39. R. Cavallesco and D. Tuan, Modulatory subdomains of the HS2 enhancer differentially regulate enhancer activity in erythroid cells at different developmental stages, Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 23 (1997), pp. 8–26.

40. R. Hardison, J. Slightom, D. Gumucio, M. Goodman, N. Stojanovic and W. Miller, Locus control regions of mammalian beta-globin gene clusters: combining phylogenetic analyses and experimental results to gain functional insights, Gene 205 (1997), pp. 73–94.

41. S. Routledge and N. Proudfoot, Definition of transcriptional promoters in the human b-globin locus control region, J. Mol. Biol. 323 (2002), pp. 601–611.



Additional References:

1. Hovsepian JA, and Frenster JH, "Sense and Antisense during RNA Initiation of the DNA Transcription Bubble", RNA2005", p. 279, The RNA Society, Bethesda, MD 20814-3998, (2005).

2. Frenster JH, "Mechanisms of Repression and De-Repression within Interphase Chromatin", In Vitro, vol. 1, pp. 78-101 (1965).

3. Frenster JH, "Correlation of the Binding to DNA Loops or to DNA Helices with the Effect on RNA Synthesis", Nature vol. 208, no. 5015, p. 1093 (December 11, 1965).

4. Herstein PR, and Frenster JH, "Mated Models of Gene Regulation in Eukaryotes", in: "Embryonic and Fetal Antigens in Cancer", vol. 2, pp. 5-7, Oak Ridge National Lab., Oak Ridge, Tenn., 1972.

5. Jabri E, "Non-Coding RNA: Small, but in Control", Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol.6, no. 5, 361 (May, 2005).

6. Dell H, "Tumorigenesis: Micromanager", Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 6, no. 5, 360, (May, 2005).

7. Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, Byrom M, Jarvis R, Cheng A, Labourier E, Reinert KL, Brown D, and Slack FJ, "RAS Is Regulated by the let-7 MicroRNA Family".

8. Grosshans H, Johnson T, Reinert KL, Gerstein M, and Slack FJ, "The Temporal Patterning MicroRNA let-7 Regulates Several Transcription Factors at the Larval to Adult Transition in C. elegans".


Links to RNA and Biological Causality:



Further Topics in:  Euchromatin,  active DNA, and  RNA  ribo-regulators:

Links to Euchromatin Activator RNA Reviews:
Links to Euchromatin Activator RNA Research:
Links to Ultrastructural Probes of DNase I-Sensitive Sites:
Links to RNA as a Therapeutic Agent:
Links to Hodgkin Lymphoma Immuno-Pathology:
Links to Activated T-Lymphocyte Immunotherapy:
Links to Medical Systems Biology:
Links to Selective Gene Transcription:
Links to RNA-Induced Epigenetics:
Links to RNA-Induced Embryogenesis:
Links to RNA and Biological Causality:
Links to Reprogramming and Neoplasia:

A Brief History of Activator RNA:

"Ultrastructural Probes of Active DNA Sites, and the RNA Activators of DNA". (PowerPoint Presentation).




Top of Page - Euchromatin Network - Current Research - Forums - Other Sites - Future Events -


For Further Information and Feedback:
E-mail: frenster@euchromatin.net
Phone:  +1 650 367 6483
Fax:  +1 650 364 1773


euchromatin: "the most active portion of the genome within the cell nucleus".